COP 28 UAE Resolution Point 2: Building on the progress made at COP 27, non-Party stakeholders actively engaged in global climate action. The snapshot of their work throughout 2023 has been reported through the Yearbook of Global Climate Action 2023, presented by the High-Level Champions at the mandated Global Climate Action High-Level Event (Opening) at COP 28.
The resolution point indicates a continuation of efforts to advance global climate action, specifically building on the progress achieved at COP 27. It emphasizes the active engagement of non-Party stakeholders in these initiatives. The mention of the Yearbook of Global Climate Action 2023, presented by the High-Level Champions at the mandated Global Climate Action High-Level Event (Opening) at COP 28, suggests a commitment to transparency and reporting on the efforts of non-Party stakeholders.
Positive Side of Resolution Point 2:
Continuity and Progress: The resolution signals a commitment to building on the progress achieved in the previous COP, indicating a sense of continuity and momentum in global climate action. This approach reflects a positive attitude toward sustained efforts to address climate change.
Active Engagement of Non-Party Stakeholders: Highlighting the active engagement of non-Party stakeholders demonstrates the importance placed on their contributions. This inclusive approach recognizes the diverse roles that businesses, cities, subnational regions, investors, and civil society can play in addressing climate challenges.
Transparency through Yearbook Reporting: The mention of the Yearbook of Global Climate Action 2023 suggests a commitment to transparency and accountability. Reporting on the work of non-Party stakeholders provides visibility into their efforts, fostering trust and facilitating a better understanding of the collective impact of global climate actions.
High-Level Event Emphasizes Importance: The fact that the Yearbook was presented at the mandated Global Climate Action High-Level Event (Opening) at COP 28 underscores the importance given to the contributions of non-Party stakeholders. This recognition at a high-level event emphasizes the significance of their role in global climate efforts.
Negative Side of Resolution Point 2:
Unclear Impact Assessment: While the resolution mentions the Yearbook reporting, it may not provide a clear assessment of the actual impact of non-Party stakeholders’ engagement. Critics might argue that a more detailed evaluation of the outcomes and effectiveness of these efforts is necessary for a comprehensive understanding.
Potential Lack of Binding Commitments: The resolution may fall short in providing clear and binding commitments for non-Party stakeholders, potentially relying on voluntary actions. Critics may argue that without stronger mandates, the engagement may not lead to the necessary transformative changes required to combat climate change effectively.
Limited Details on Stakeholder Contributions: The resolution does not provide specific details on the nature or scale of contributions from non-Party stakeholders. Critics might contend that without a detailed breakdown, it is challenging to assess the significance and effectiveness of their actions.
Possible Lack of Incentives: While active engagement is encouraged, the resolution does not elaborate on whether there are sufficient incentives or mechanisms to motivate non-Party stakeholders. Critics may raise concerns about the sustainability of engagement without clear incentives or consequences for non-compliance.
